KristianKeller
1627

Imagine Queen of England would claim...

Imagine Queen of England would claim to be Catholic

This is an imaginary situation to serve as an example. But imagine for a moment, that Queen of England, yes that head of the protestant sect The Church of England, that she would come out one day and say, "today I am a Catholic". Very unimaginable that Queen of England would say that she is a Catholic.

However, imagine for sake of argument that she would say that, but also at the same time she would still be professing to be head of Church of England, or she would be saying instead of that, that abortions are beneficial, or would be praising people for it, or that LGBT-Q people need to have equal rights, and they should be treated with respect.

Although she would say that she is a Catholic in this little scenario, she would still be a heretic. For a Catholic you cannot just say that you are a Catholic, you have to be consistent with what you preach.
Would it not be on it's own head to consider her Catholic from that point? Yes, it would be preposterous to consider her Catholic.
Would we still treat her as heretic? Yes.
Should we consider her inconsistent liar in that scenario -for she would be saying she's a Catholic, but would still promote uncatholic evils - , a wolf in clothing of a sheep? Yes.
Anything else than rightly condemning her so , any approval of her would be deemed as abominable act on part of people considering her a Catholic. For a Catholic you have to be consistent, not just say that you are a Catholic. You have to be consistent with Catholic teaching. Keep that in mind.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: “can it be lawful for anyone to reject any one of those truths without by that very fact falling into heresy? – without separating himself from the Church? – without repudiating in one sweeping act the whole of Christian teaching? For such is the nature of faith that nothing can be more absurd than to accept some things and reject others. Faith, as the Church teaches, is that supernatural virtue by which… we believe what He has revealed to be true, not on account of the intrinsic truth perceived by the natural light of human reason [author: that is, not because it seems correct to us], but because of the authority of God Himself, the Revealer, who can neither deceive nor be deceivedBut he who dissents even in one point from divinely revealed truth absolutely rejects all faith, since he thereby refuses to honor God as the supreme truth and the formal motive of faith.”

Ok. That is about if she would claim to be a Catholic. When she does not claim to be a Catholic, and we are not longer talking about the scenario, we are moving on to what is a today's reality, ... a reality where she claims to be a head of The Church of England, she is in fact a heretic. Anyone who tells you she is a Catholic would be a liar and heretic himself. Anyone who would hold public services with the "priests" of her protestant sect would be considered a heretic, everyone who would hold "communion" with her ( or her "priests") would be considered heretic, period.

For a salvation you have to be a traditional Catholic. You have to profess the true faith.

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (# 22), June 29, 1943: “Actually only those are to be included as members of the Church who have received the laver of regeneration and profess the true faith…”

Well, what do you know... what do you know about Francis who claims to be a pope.
He openly has a prayer meetings with Anglican sect's "priests", he has inter-religious meetings and prayers, holds "liturgical" services with them, receives "blessing" from them, ect. , among many other things. Considering the scenario we were talking about, can a person say about man called Francis to be a Catholic? As an answer there must be a thunderous: NO!

He is not a Catholic
, even though he claims to be a Catholic. And a Non-Catholic cannot be considered to be a pope. Since he is a man who professes not a true faith, but professes a false faith, therefore he is not longer a Catholic. It is that simple. Since he is not a Christian, he is outside of the Church, and therefore cannot be considered pope. Anyone who considers him to be a pope would be abominable. For such person would be in a diabolical and inconsistent position which would lead him to hell. That is why it is so devastating to consider Francis to be a pope. He is not a pope but non-Catholic antipope.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (#15), June 29, 1896: ” it is absurd to imagine that he who is outside can command in the Church.”

That's why sedevacantist position is only possible position one must reach. Position which is consistent with Catholic teaching and what Church has always held. Namely that a heretic cannot be a pope.

St. Robert Bellarmine: “A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction.”

So next time, when you see someone defending antipope Francis, know that such a person is a tool that Satan uses to keep people on road to hell. They have no knowledge about Catholic teaching. What we see in Rome since II Vatican Council is apostasy from faith, and reign of antipopes. What is in Rome is not a Catholic church, but rather endtimes counter Church, a Vatican II sect. The material on vaticancatholic.com proves that. Please visit the website, and check out the material there which is very critical for salvation. Start praying Holy Rosary. You must be convinced on all the issues, and reject uncatholic sect in Rome. For antipope Francis is an equivalent of an Anglican Queen that would like to hold to be Catholic and at same time promote gays, abortions. And once you are convinced on all of the issues you should see the steps to conversion on the website. You must leave the Novus Ordo sect, the ecumenical whore with poisonous cup, that inter-religious sect.

Antipope Francis gave medal to abortionist (by giving medal to main abortionist): youtu.be
Antipope Francis promotes LGBT-Q : www.youtube.com/watch

Francis is not a Catholic, don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
See more on the website, vaticancatholic.com.

This situation you see around was prophesied. We are living through the final days.

Our Lady of La Salette, Sept. 19, 1846: “Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ… the Church will be in eclipse.”

Luke 18:8 (Jesus speaking:) I say to you, that he will quickly revenge them. But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?

KristianKeller
Also a must-see video, antipope Francis calls trying to convert someone poisonous, he totally rejects Christianity: www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/accepting-anti-…