Bergoglio was disqualified from became a pope due to his heretical, apostate and schismatic past in Argentina. BERGOGLIO´S HERETICAL PAST IS FRANCIS PRESENT. Bergoglio was a pertinacious public heretic …More
Bergoglio was disqualified from became a pope due to his heretical, apostate and schismatic past in Argentina.
BERGOGLIO´S HERETICAL PAST IS FRANCIS PRESENT.
Bergoglio was a pertinacious public heretic years before the 2013 INVALID Conclave Bergoglio the heretic "clergyman" who was invalidly appointed pope.
Bull of Pope Paul IV Against Heretics: "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio" (virgosacrata.com)
Pope Pius IV (1499-1565)
"We declare that if ever it should appear that any bishop, even one acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch, or Primate, or a Cardinal of the Roman Church, or a legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, whether prior to his promotion to Cardinal, or prior to his election as Roman Pontiff, has beforehand deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into any heresy, we enact, we decree, we determine, we define: Such promotion or election in and of itself, even with the agreement and unanimous consent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, legally invalid, and void. It shall not be possible for such a promotion or election to be deemed valid or to be valid, neither through reception of office, consecration, subsequent administration, or possession, not even through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff himself, together with the veneration and obedience accorded him by all. Such promotion or election shall not through any lapse of time in the foregoing situation be considered even partially legitimate in any way. Each and all of the words, as acts, laws, appointments of those so promoted or elected -- and indeed, whatsoever flows there from -- shall be lacking in force, and shall grant no stability and legal power to anyone whatsoever. Those so promoted or elected, by that very fact and without the need to make any further declaration, shall be deprived of any dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office, and power. Therefore, it is permitted to no one to impair this page of Our approval, renewal, sanction, statute, wills of repeal, of decrees, or to go contrary to it by a rash daring deed. If anyone, moreover, will have presumed to attempt this, he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul." -Pope Paul IV (1555-1559), Bull "Cum ex Apostolatus Officio," February 16, 1559, sec. 9
BERGOGLIO´S HERETICAL PAST IS FRANCIS PRESENT.
Bergoglio was a pertinacious public heretic years before the 2013 INVALID Conclave Bergoglio the heretic "clergyman" who was invalidly appointed pope.
Bull of Pope Paul IV Against Heretics: "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio" (virgosacrata.com)
Pope Pius IV (1499-1565)
"We declare that if ever it should appear that any bishop, even one acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch, or Primate, or a Cardinal of the Roman Church, or a legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, whether prior to his promotion to Cardinal, or prior to his election as Roman Pontiff, has beforehand deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into any heresy, we enact, we decree, we determine, we define: Such promotion or election in and of itself, even with the agreement and unanimous consent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, legally invalid, and void. It shall not be possible for such a promotion or election to be deemed valid or to be valid, neither through reception of office, consecration, subsequent administration, or possession, not even through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff himself, together with the veneration and obedience accorded him by all. Such promotion or election shall not through any lapse of time in the foregoing situation be considered even partially legitimate in any way. Each and all of the words, as acts, laws, appointments of those so promoted or elected -- and indeed, whatsoever flows there from -- shall be lacking in force, and shall grant no stability and legal power to anyone whatsoever. Those so promoted or elected, by that very fact and without the need to make any further declaration, shall be deprived of any dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office, and power. Therefore, it is permitted to no one to impair this page of Our approval, renewal, sanction, statute, wills of repeal, of decrees, or to go contrary to it by a rash daring deed. If anyone, moreover, will have presumed to attempt this, he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul." -Pope Paul IV (1555-1559), Bull "Cum ex Apostolatus Officio," February 16, 1559, sec. 9
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
“Team Bergoglio” is the plot against the Church by a group of Cardinals who launched a lobbying campaign before the conclave to elect Bergoglio.
One more comment from la verdad prevalece
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bull of Pope Paul IV Against Heretics: "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio" (virgosacrata.com)
Catholic Encyclopedia 1914 (Vol. 11, p. 456):
“It is very clear that the election [as Pope] of a heretic, schismatic or woman would be null and void.”
Catholic Encyclopedia 1914 (Vol. 11, p. 456):
“It is very clear that the election [as Pope] of a heretic, schismatic or woman would be null and void.”
la verdad prevalece shares this
- Report
Remove share
Those who claim to be Catholic are so blind that they cannot tell a wolf from a sheep.
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
They don’t hold the revised Rites to be invalid, as far as I know. Bishop Williamson was interviewed recently, and reiterated that he believes the new Rites are doubtful, the Rite of Episcopal ordination being more doubtful than that for priests. I would think Bergoglio was ordained by a bishop who was consecrated under the old Rite. Of course, anything doubtful is illicit, and they would hold that …More
They don’t hold the revised Rites to be invalid, as far as I know. Bishop Williamson was interviewed recently, and reiterated that he believes the new Rites are doubtful, the Rite of Episcopal ordination being more doubtful than that for priests. I would think Bergoglio was ordained by a bishop who was consecrated under the old Rite. Of course, anything doubtful is illicit, and they would hold that he is doubtfully a bishop. It is hard for me to imagine why they deal with him at all. Lefebvre had decided not to deal with Rome until they came to their senses. Clearly, Rome has not returned to the Faith.
The current SSPX (as opposed to SSPX-Resistance etc.) no longer even require conditional (re)ordination for priests coming over from the novus ordo. The attitude for all the changed sacraments seems to be "hold your nose" but accept they're kind of, sort of, valid. It doesn't seem very well thought-through.
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@John A Cassani It does not depend on the bishop who invalidly ordained Bergoglio because they consider the new ordination rite itself invalid, in addition to considering the Novus Ordo mass invalid.
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@lancs1 I know that the Fraternity since 2012 made an agreement with Pope Benedict XVI to be recognized by Rome and currently the Fraternity has been divided and there is a resistance group but precisely that resistance group continues to demand conditional (re)ordination for priests but they accept Bergoglio as pope.
Jeffrey Ade
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Consider the situation. Most people accept F as pope. What does it matter if you accept him or not, does your faith change one iota? NO!