In the document whereby the hapless Paul VI permitted Communion in the hand, he nevertheless urged the faithful to continue the ancient tradition of Communion on the tongue. Another consideration is the fact that Paul's refusal to discipline those bishops and priests who were promoting Communion in the hand, despite this deviation being in disobedience to the laws of the Church, led to his being forced to give permission for the practice. And as Aquinas teaches: nothing. born in disobedience to the Church will bear fruit.

@chris griffin Your attitude was condemned as "antiquarianism" by Pius XII. You might do well to read this short essay which addresses your point of view:

The Continual Spectre of False Antiquarianism

Our Lord and Our Lady are providing increasingly incontrovertible evidence that the church of Vatican II is a facade. Any Vatican who would permit this man to continue in his Office while hunting down and removing any bishop that even ever-so-slightly deviates from the Vatican II script is a counterfeit Vatican. ANY bishop that remains silent amidst this mitered creature's heresy (especially on this subject) participates in a counterfeit hierarchy. Heaven, with crystalizing clarity, is challenging us to make our "Yes mean yes, and our no mean no" on the question if this counterfeit church has upheld or is upholding the One True Faith.

There needs to be some whistleblowers outing Christine Niles as to the long-time coverup of Michael Voris' behavior at Church Militant: "What did she know and when did she know it?" Her story of ignorance until just before she resigned from Church Militant just doesn't add up. She's getting a free pass - and undeservedly so. I suspect the problem is that his behavior was commonly known and everyone was silent in order to keep Church Militant from going under and they losing their jobs - as it and they eventually did.